2010–2026
Participation statistics
Laboratory participation in our proficiency testing schemes and the evaluation of results.
- programme rounds
- 134
- A round is one edition of a proficiency testing programme, for example ZZB 2024/1.
- test methods
- 111
- A test method is a test according to one standard and method, for example compressive strength of concrete to EN 12390-3. Every method included in at least one round is counted.
- laboratory participations
- 3,939
- A participation is one laboratory in one programme round. A laboratory that took part in five rounds is counted five times.
- evaluated results
- 19,814
- One laboratory result for one test parameter, evaluated by z-score in the final report. A laboratory usually has several in one round.
- satisfactory results
- 92.3%
- Share of evaluated results with |z| < 2, i.e. in agreement with the other laboratories. Calculated from all results, including outliers.
- fully successful laboratories
- 76.9%
- Share of participations in which the laboratory had all its results in the programme round rated satisfactory.
Evaluation of results
All fields
- satisfactory 92.3% 18,290 results |z| < 2
- questionable 4.2% 825 results 2 ≤ |z| < 3
- unsatisfactory 1.7% 336 results |z| ≥ 3
- outliers 1.8% 363 results excluded by an outlier test
Participation and evaluation by year
All fields
Participants' countries 2017–2026
All fields
- Countries
- 41
- Registrations
- 3,274
Programme registrations 2017–2026
- 1–9
- 10–49
- 50–199
- 200 and more
- Brno
No country data for this field.
- Czechia1,601
- Slovakia304
- Serbia195
- Belgium122
- Bulgaria106
- Lithuania102
- Austria91
- Greece81
- Algeria73
- Bosnia and Herzegovina67
- Croatia59
- Hungary57
- Poland56
- Ireland48
- Italy43
- Romania36
- Colombia26
- United Kingdom24
- Malaysia22
- Germany20
- Albania19
- North Macedonia19
- Cyprus18
- Netherlands11
- Portugal11
- Slovenia11
- Georgia10
- Moldova7
- Montenegro6
- Latvia5
- Singapore5
- Egypt4
- Denmark3
- Brazil2
- Estonia2
- Malta2
- Azerbaijan2
- Armenia1
- Norway1
- Pakistan1
- Spain1
Test methods
All fields
Comparison of testing fields
| Field | Participations | Satisfactory |
|---|---|---|
| ZZBHardened concrete | 92.3% | |
| ZKAggregates | 91.3% | |
| ZZSoils | 91.5% | |
| ZCBFresh concrete | 97.0% | |
| ZMCMortars, cements and adhesives | 94.7% | |
| ZVPPlastics | 93.3% | |
| ZZPMasonry units | 93.1% | |
| ZAPAsphalt mixtures and binders | 93.9% | |
| ZOReinforcing steel | 86.6% | |
| ZHUFinished road surfaces | 95.1% | |
| ZDTimber | 96.2% | |
| PAUPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons | 96.9% | |
| Total | 92.3% |
Reading the results
All fields
The z-score tells how many standard deviations a laboratory's result lies from the assigned value. The closer to zero, the better; the sign shows whether the result is higher or lower.
-
satisfactory|z| < 2
The result agrees with the other laboratories.
- Theory
- 95.45%
- Our schemes
- 94.0%
-
questionable2 ≤ |z| < 3
Warning signal: the result is borderline and the laboratory should review its test procedure.
- Theory
- 4.28%
- Our schemes
- 4.2%
-
unsatisfactory|z| ≥ 3
The result differs too much. The laboratory looks for the cause and takes corrective action.
- Theory
- 0.27%
- Our schemes
- 1.7%
-
outliersexcluded by an outlier test
The laboratory mean lies too far from the others (Grubbs' test), or the scatter of its repeated measurements is conspicuously large (Cochran's test). The result is excluded before the evaluation so that it does not distort the assigned value.
- Our schemes
- 1.8%
Theory: how the ratings would come out if, after excluding outliers, the results followed the normal distribution exactly. Our schemes: share of results after excluding outliers; for outliers, share of all results.
How to read the figures
- A participation is one laboratory in one programme round; for a test method, a laboratory that performed the method in that round.
- A result is one laboratory result for one parameter and test item, evaluated by z-score in the final report.
- Outliers are results of participants excluded by the Cochran or Grubbs test; they do not count as successful.
- A fully successful laboratory has all its results in the given method and round rated satisfactory.
- The criteria are taken from the final reports in accordance with ISO 5725-2, ISO/IEC 17043 and ISO 13528.
- The map of countries is based on registrations submitted through the website in 2017–2026; earlier rounds are not included.